• Entertainment
  • Finance
  • Marketing
  • Real Estate
  • Technology
  • Social
National Journal Community Of e-Experts
Finance 0

Are Soybean Tariffs Irrelevant?

By Kurt Osterberg · On April 10, 2018

I’ve seen the argument that China’s tariffs on soybeans will have no effect because the soybeans will be relabeled so that US soybeans go to Europe, and soybeans that previously went to Europe go to China, evading Chinese tariffs on US soybeans. John Cochrane makes this point. This seems to have surface appeal in a world where transport costs are zero, and there are no set-up costs to establishing new trading links. Still, I sensed that this conclusion must rest on some assumptions, including for instance infinitely elastic supply. I decided to investigate further.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume zero transport costs. What does formal modeling say? This was beyond me, fortunately I didn’t have to re-invent the wheel. From Gardner and Kimbrough, “The economics of country specific tariffs,” International Economic Review (1990):

[W]hen the favored country’s free trade production of home importables is large enough the imposition of a country-specific tariff will alter the pattern of world trade but will not affect relative prices or welfare levels throughout the world economy. When this condition is not satisfied a country-specific tariff has an impact that is equivalent to that of a uniform tariff plus a production subsidy in the favored country that is paid for by a transfer from the home country.

In this context, China is “home” and the “favored country” is Brazil or Argentina. Then Cochrane is correct — if the Brazil or Argentina is a sufficiently large low cost producer, then the country-specific tariff targeting the US merely re-arranges trading patterns.

However, if neither Brazil or Argentina are the largest producer, or the US is low cost producer, then the tariff will lower world prices, and raise prices in China. What do the data say?

For costs, this 2016 USDA ERS report suggests that the US is neither the lowest cost, nor highest cost, producer.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share Tweet

Kurt Osterberg

You Might Also Like

  • Finance

    STEPN Sneaker NFTs Sell For $100, Previously Worth $1200

  • Finance

    NFT Prices in Free Fall – 5 NFT Collections to Start Buying Today

  • Finance

    5 NFTs Trending on Twitter Going Cheap to Invest in Now

No Comments

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Top Finance

  • 3 Best Large-Cap Blend Mutual Funds For Enticing Returns 3 Best Large-Cap Blend Mutual Funds For Enticing Returns
  • Hedge Funds In The US Hedge Funds In The US
  • What is Value Chain Analysis? How to Deliver Value & Gain a Competitive Advantage What is Value Chain Analysis? How to Deliver Value & Gain a Competitive Advantage
  • 5 Ridiculously Useful Non-Monetary Reward Examples that Improve Employee Engagement 5 Ridiculously Useful Non-Monetary Reward Examples that Improve Employee Engagement
  • Chart: Amazon’s Dominance In Ecommerce Chart: Amazon’s Dominance In Ecommerce

New Posts

  • STEPN Sneaker NFTs Sell For $100, Previously Worth $1200

    STEPN Sneaker NFTs Sell For $100, Previously Worth $1200

    June 20, 2022
  • NFT Prices in Free Fall – 5 NFT Collections to Start Buying Today

    NFT Prices in Free Fall – 5 NFT Collections to Start Buying Today

    June 20, 2022
  • 5 NFTs Trending on Twitter Going Cheap to Invest in Now

    5 NFTs Trending on Twitter Going Cheap to Invest in Now

    June 20, 2022
  • Bill Gates – ‘NFTs & Crypto Based on Greater Fool Theory’

    Bill Gates – ‘NFTs & Crypto Based on Greater Fool Theory’

    June 20, 2022
  • Actor Seth Green Pays $300,000 to Recover his Stolen BAYC NFT

    Actor Seth Green Pays $300,000 to Recover his Stolen BAYC NFT

    June 20, 2022
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of use

Copyright © 2018-2021 NJCEE. All Rights Reserved.