• Entertainment
  • Finance
  • Marketing
  • Real Estate
  • Technology
  • Social
National Journal Community Of e-Experts
Finance 0

What’s The End Game?

By Kurt Osterberg · On April 8, 2018

From Toles:

The question we should be asking (prompted by my thinking about the relevance of game theory) is which payoff matrix is of relevance. Here, it makes sense to differentiate between the objectives of Mr. Trump and the United States as a whole.

  • To degrade China’s ability to ascend the quality ladder, and maintain US technical leadership in advanced production technologies.
  • To reduce the bilateral trade deficit with China.
  • To reduce the overall US trade deficit.
  • To increase the Republican party’s ability to retain control of the legislative branch.
  • To activate nativist and xenophobic groups within the Trump electoral coalition.
  • To satisfy atavistic desires to impose pain on foreign parties.
  • Surely, this is not an exhaustive list, but I think it covers a lot of possibilities.

    It is useful to then consider the efficacy of (i) anti-dumping duties, (ii) Section 232 tariffs, and (iii) Section 301 tariffs in the context of these objectives, keeping in the mind the targeting principle — the core idea of which “is that if a new regulation of some sort is required, the most efficient intervention targets the specific variable of direct interest.”

    Hence, if (1) is the objective, then strict implementation of the CFIUS process, augmented by perhaps additional legislation (and funding), combined with increased expenditures in civilian and military R&D, tax breaks for R&D, and increased educational funding aimed at science and technology (including grants for higher educational system) would be in order. I don’t see moves toward the second — perhaps more important aspect — of retaining our technological lead in Mr. Trump’s agenda.

    If (2) is the objective, then tariffs and quotas might have an impact. However, it is unclear whether the bilateral trade deficit has any economic meaning. At the same time, reducing the bilateral trade deficit might have meaningful economic costs (higher input costs as trade is diverted from the lowest cost producer, disruption to existing value chains, etc.)

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    Share Tweet

    Kurt Osterberg

    You Might Also Like

    • Finance

      STEPN Sneaker NFTs Sell For $100, Previously Worth $1200

    • Finance

      NFT Prices in Free Fall – 5 NFT Collections to Start Buying Today

    • Finance

      5 NFTs Trending on Twitter Going Cheap to Invest in Now

    No Comments

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Top Finance

    • 3 Best Large-Cap Blend Mutual Funds For Enticing Returns 3 Best Large-Cap Blend Mutual Funds For Enticing Returns
    • What is Value Chain Analysis? How to Deliver Value & Gain a Competitive Advantage What is Value Chain Analysis? How to Deliver Value & Gain a Competitive Advantage
    • Hedge Funds In The US Hedge Funds In The US
    • 5 Ridiculously Useful Non-Monetary Reward Examples that Improve Employee Engagement 5 Ridiculously Useful Non-Monetary Reward Examples that Improve Employee Engagement
    • Chart: Amazon’s Dominance In Ecommerce Chart: Amazon’s Dominance In Ecommerce

    New Posts

    • STEPN Sneaker NFTs Sell For $100, Previously Worth $1200

      STEPN Sneaker NFTs Sell For $100, Previously Worth $1200

      June 20, 2022
    • NFT Prices in Free Fall – 5 NFT Collections to Start Buying Today

      NFT Prices in Free Fall – 5 NFT Collections to Start Buying Today

      June 20, 2022
    • 5 NFTs Trending on Twitter Going Cheap to Invest in Now

      5 NFTs Trending on Twitter Going Cheap to Invest in Now

      June 20, 2022
    • Bill Gates – ‘NFTs & Crypto Based on Greater Fool Theory’

      Bill Gates – ‘NFTs & Crypto Based on Greater Fool Theory’

      June 20, 2022
    • Actor Seth Green Pays $300,000 to Recover his Stolen BAYC NFT

      Actor Seth Green Pays $300,000 to Recover his Stolen BAYC NFT

      June 20, 2022
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy & Policy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of use

    Copyright © 2018-2021 NJCEE. All Rights Reserved.